Bank of England’s “smoke and mirrors” forward guidance will thoroughly confuse the average person says Schroders

12th February 2014

img

Fund managaer Schroders has warned that Bank of England decision to replace the 7% unemployment target with estimates of spare capacity risks being manipulated and will prove confusing for the average person. The firm’s European economist Azad Zangana says the approach is very similar to old ‘Golden rule’ introduced by Gordon Brown.

In a note issued today, he writes: “Rather than focusing on the unemployment rate, the Bank will now focus on estimates of spare capacity, which is largely measured through the labour market. This is very similar to the old ‘Golden Rule’ as introduced by Gordon Brown. Using measures of the economic cycle and therefore spare capacity to set targets. However, as has been proven in the past, estimates of spare capacity are highly uncertain and certainly subject to a large degree of discretion, which in our view can be manipulated to suit other objectives”.

He notes that one of the key indicators is the unemployment gap: the difference between the unemployment rate and the estimate of the medium-term equilibrium unemployment rate. “The Bank currently believes that this gap is 1.2% – effectively setting a new unemployment target of 5.9%. However, this could be revised in either direction if there are signs that the medium-term equilibrium rate changes. For example, the Bank has noted that a larger than expected fall in the long-term unemployment rate (those unemployed for more than 12 months), which suggests that there is greater scope for the headline unemployment rate to fall further, as these long-term unemployed would have been considered to be less likely to gain employment”.

Other key indicators include:

total hours worked gap,

average hours gap,

vacancies to unemployment rate ratio,

proportion of temporary workers unable to find permanent work

and the labour force participation gap.

Zangana adds: “There is little doubt that the BoE has always considered every available indicator when assessing the degree of spare capacity, and therefore future inflation. However, the change in the Bank’s communication policy looks like a confuse and conquer approach.

“The Bank’s smoke and mirrors approach to forward guidance – which on the one hand will highlight the degree of complexity in setting monetary policy whilst on the other will thoroughly confuse the average person – will certainly introduce new uncertainty for their expectations on the future path of interest rates.

“In our view, the information presented today highlights the Bank’s reluctance to raise interest rates. Carney highlighted the sharp appreciation in Sterling, and the impact that this has had in lowering inflation through imported prices. Conditioned on the market’s path of interest rates, inflation in the medium-term is below the Bank’s central target of 2%, which is a signal that the Bank thinks the market’s pricing of a rate hike in early 2015 as being too aggressive.

Zangana notes that the Bank’s GDP growth forecast is a huge 3.4% for 2014. He says that this is a full percentage point higher than our own, and higher than any other forecast that we could find. Unless the Bank has spotted something that the market has missed, then we expect them to be forced to cut their growth forecast within months.

“We are happy to stick to our forecast on interest rates being held until the start of 2016. The Bank now has at least 18 different variables it can point to keep interest rates on hold. The danger further out will be when inflation starts to rise again. We could be questioning the Bank’s credibility again as an inflation fighter, which risks de-anchoring inflation expectations. However, this is a distant problem as lower energy, food and imported prices should push inflation lower in the near term.”

 

2 thoughts on “Bank of England’s “smoke and mirrors” forward guidance will thoroughly confuse the average person says Schroders”

  1. therrawbuzzin says:

    ZIRP will continue for as long as the banks need stuffing with all the wealth we can create.
    That was always the case, and Carney’s implication that human(e) reasons for keeping it were a nasty and deliberate deception.
    The fact that 18 other variables “are taken into account” is just further obvious duplicity, and it is equally obvious that Gideon’s poodle possesses as little professional integrity as competence.

  2. Anonymous says:

    I don’t understand this bit about an unemployment target of 5.9%. The February Inflation Report says: “More recently, longer-term unemployment has fallen back: around half of the fall in total unemployment between June and November 2013 was among the long and medium-term unemployed (Chart 3.9), reducing Bank staff’s estimate of the
    medium-term equilibrium rate to 6%–6½%. So doesn’t that make 6%-6½% the new unemployment rate target, or 6¼% if you go to a point estimate?

    Andrew Baldwin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *