Is Finance immoral?
- 19 June 2012
I have no interest in justifying the amoral – and frequently illegal –behavior of bankers and traders, but neither do I want to attack them with a psychiatric diagnosis. That is a perverse use of professional expertise. More important, it is inaccurate and unhelpful.
As a psychologist who frequently works as a coach and advisor to traders, I know the pressures they are under to deliver profits in a highly competitive and fast moving industry. And, yes, they do occasionally slip and behave badly. But in that, frankly, they are no worse than the rest of us, as has been demonstrated in frequent studies that track the influence of groups and authorities on individual behavior.
It is a systemic issue, not an individual one. Money is amoral. Capital craves growth. In an age of "Investor Capitalism," where we are all invested, the firms that respond to the demands for growth are vying against other firms and often against their own past performance. And the stakes are large. They are supposed to be guided by systems to control for risk, but the organizations that design such systems are really more worried about losing out on the competition than making mistakes. That's what they see. That's what they talk about, and that is how their judgment gets clouded.
It is a dysfunctional system. To be sure, individuals in it are frequently impulsive, driven, with short attention spans, and often fearful of failure. That makes them more than usually vulnerable to external pressure. In the heat of trading, they lose perspective.
But if we think in terms of paedophilia, criminals and psychopathy, we lose sight of individual responsibility and motivation, and we deprive ourselves of the tools that might reform the system.
More from Ken Eisold:
To receive our free daily newsletter sign up here.
- The Manchester United and David Moyes saga is all about the debt and leverage
- What has happened to food and energy prices and inflation in 2014?
- Both the Bank of England and the UK Public Finances are having a Mad Hatters Tea Party
- Invesco Perpetual's Mark Barnett on where UK equities go from here
- AstraZeneca gets a Pfizer boost
- Mindful Money's weekly share-tips: Sports Direct, Reed Elsevier, Unilever, William Hill and WPP
- The unanswered question - could new mortgage lending rules restrain house prices - outside London at least?
- Gap between investor income expectations and actual returns widens
- Despite greater pension freedom retirees are set to see their income collapse
- Lower earners and self employed may fail to get mortgages as big lenders' computerised decisions apply tougher lending rules