On Thursday and Friday of last week I discussed the latest economic figures from China which showed economic growth of 9.7% and consumer price inflation of 5.4%. Such signs of overheating were only partially ameliorated by a reduction in the growth of Chinese broad money supply measure to an annual growth rate of 16.6%. Yesterday continuing its recent habit of announcing moves on non-work days the People’s Bank of China announced an in crease in reserve requirements for China’s banks. This means that from Thursday 21st of April China’s largest banks will now have a reserve requirement of 20.5% which will be 0.5% higher than before. So we are beginning to learn what the Governor of the PBOC meant when he said this last week.
Our monetary policy will continue to move from moderately loose to prudent……..The trend will continue for some time.
Regular readers will be aware that it is my opinion that rises in reserve requirements are a weak policy tool and accordingly if it relies on it as a tool the PBOC may well have to keep it up for some time! Fortunately it is also raising interest-rates although as more and more stories are circulating about house price falls in some parts of China the central bank may be afraid of rising rates much more. The other alternative would be to let the Yuan appreciate but as it has only risen by 4.5% since China signalled it would allow more flexibility in it last June.
So we see that whilst China has raised interest-rates four times over the past 6 months or so it has been unwilling to let the Yuan rise by much. So it has been relying on raising bank reserve requirements as a policy tool. Now to complicate matters there appear to be signs of a weakening of her property market. So we may well be facing what these days is a crucial test for a central bank, will it continue tightening its policy in the face of falls in house prices? I know I have some readers in China and would be interested to hear their thoughts on the current state of the property market there.
Over the weekend Finland had a general election and this political development may have economic consequences way beyond Finland’s borders. The reason for this is the the Euro-sceptic True Finns ended up with 19% of the vote and the Social Democrats who oppose aid for Greece and Ireland also won 19% whilst the party of the previous Prime Minister only got 15%. Now coalition government s can take many unexpected forms after all look at what happened in the UK just under a year ago! However there is the prospect of Finland’s next government having a strong Euro-sceptic influence.
This matters for several reasons. One is the structure of Finnish democracy which requires individual votes on approval of rescue packages. The other is the way that many matters in the Euro zone are coming to a head. For example negotiations are going on right now as to what type of rescue package will be given to Portugal which lets face it will be complicated enough by the fact that Portugal only has a caretaker government until the June 5th elections. Also the main rescue fund the European Financial Stability Facility ( has anybody else spotted that it has in fact led to instability?) requires a boost to its funds which is due soon. Also the replacement to the EFSF the ESM which is due to start in July 2013 relies heavily on AAA rated countries of which one is Finland.
This may not be the Finnish (sorry) of the current rescue packages but it does pose a few questions. And here is one for you if this did lead to them being scrapped would it be a bad thing? After all both Greece and Ireland look like they are deteriorating under these so-called rescues.
Greece’s woes continue
On the subject of Greece the situation is continually beset now by leaks from official bodies that it will need to restructure its debt which are followed by ever more hollow sounding official denials. Latest to join in is the International Monetary Fund which according to the Wall Street Journal thinks the following.
The IMF believes the debt situation in Greece is unsustainable………Senior (IMF) officials have told the parties involved that restructuring should be considered soon.
In a view that is very similar to the one expressed by George Soros that I wrote about last week the IMF is unofficially suggesting that one of the routes forward involves a substantial extension to the maturity of Greece’s exisiting debt.
How would this help?
If we look at the government bond I discussed on Friday the 6% bond which expires in 2020 it would have its maturity changed to 2030. This would mean that the principal (the amount originally borrowed by Greece) would be repaid ten years later which would obviously help her going forwards in terms of cashflow (5 billion Euros) and would also give time for hopefully there to be a substantial amount of economic growth in the meantime which would make the repayment affordable. UK readers may think that this section sounds oddly like an Ocean Finance advertisement and the truth is that there are similarities. It is also true that there is an element of “kicking the can down the road.”
Where real relief comes in the shorter term is if the same system is applied to bonds which are to be renewed sooner than 2020. If we look at one of these the 4.5% bond expiring in May 2014 then Greece’s financial position in 2014 would be improved by not repaying it until 2020 by some 8.5 billion Euros.
The catch is what would happen to investors in these bonds. The price of the bond expiring in 2014 closed at 68.15 on Friday. This is quite chilling when you consider that not only does Greece promise you 100 in May 2014 but she also has the EU/ECB/IMF backing her up. The markets are saying, we don’t believe you! An investors buying now would expect 100 in May 2014 as the capital component of the 19% redemption yield. Moving the return of the prinicipal to 2020 would accordingly be quite a punishment compared with getting it in 2014.
What else would the IMF do?
At the same time the IMF would extend the term of its current aid package from 3 years towards 10 years. This would further help Greece by not having to repay the money the IMF has lent it. You might think it is odd that the Euro zone increased the maturity of its loans to Greece but the IMF has not so far and you would be right.
Why is the IMF acting in such a way?
The IMF is concerned about the existing holders of Greek government debt. These are the Greek banks, the European Central Bank and foreign banks. It feels that operating in this way and perhaps also reducing the interest-rate on Greek government bonds will avoid too much of an impact on them. If you look at the prices of Greek government bonds you might think that these institutions have been punished heavily already. However the Euro zone banking stress tests followed the European Central Bank convention that as sovereign default is unthinkable the prinicpal will be returned and the losses on the bonds need not be accounted for if they are held to maturity. I would give my view on this but Earth Wind and Fire got their first.
Take a ride in the sky, on our ship fantasii
all your dreams will come true, right away
The Greek government responds
On Friday the Greek government tried to dampen speculation about restructuring by annoucing some medium-term plans. These involved an extra 26 billion Euros of austerity and 50 billion Euros of privatisations although in a familiar theme there was a lack of detail as to how all of this is going to be achieved. Events, however are now showing signs of speeding up as Kathimerini is reporting that Greek Finance Minister Papaconstantinou has raised the issue of extending the maturities on all of Greece’s debts of about 340 billion Euros.
His idea of Greece returning to longer-term borrowing in 2012 is looking like it is joining his previous claims of doing this in 2011 which look firmly in the grip of the song I have quoted from above. From this we get a big factor behind the sudden talk of restructuring. Numbers in Greece are often revised but as we stand Greece needs to borrow around 27 billion Euros next year and the question that is now being asked is how?
Is outright default now possible?
Yes. When I started this blog I pointed out how expensive such a move was likely to be and that it came with quite a few problems. However the situation has been so mishandled that it is by no means inconceivable now and may even be an improvement on the alternative.
US Consumer Price Inflation
These numbers were considered to be relatively good news by the markets on Friday. Whilst the headline number hit 2.7% the annualised number for core inflation fell to 1.6%. Since core inflation excludes many of the things which are rising ( and many of the most vital parts of life……) this perhaps was not the good news it was apparently received as.
However I notice I am not the only person questioning the credibility of these numbers. My attention was drawn to some research which pointed this out. Apparel (clothing) prices fell by 0.6% on the month which followed a 0.9% fall in February according to the seasonally adjusted figures. Slightly surprising you might think considering the way commodity prices for goods such as cotton have risen.Well you might be even more surprised to learn that the raw data shows that apparel prices rose by 2.5% in March. Is down the new up?
Ireland’s Housing Market
On Friday there was an auction of 84 properties at the Shelbourne Hotel in Dublin. I understand that Jagdip Singh who follows such matters closely feels that the prices achieved were 60% below the peak. The reason why this echoed in my mind is that a house price fall of 60% was the adverse scenario that Ireland’ s banking stress tests assumed less than 3 weeks ago. In some areas at least adverse is already here.
Whisper it quietly but if a country was to default and start again the biggest potential gains would be found in Ireland if it cut much of its banking sector adrift….