Mervyn King rallies the pound whilst raising fears of the “Early Wire” in currency markets

Last night Mervyn King gave an interview to ITV News which was broadcast in its early evening and night time news programmes. Unfortunately in the gap between recording and broadcasting the interview there were some substantial moves in UK financial markets particularly in the pounds exchange rate and in interest rate markets. For example the pound surged when the normal market consensus was more in line with a report released by HSBC that it would fall against the Euro and drop to US $1.46. Instead yesterday afternoon saw a new macho supersoaraway pound which took off like a rocket from US $1.493 to touch US $1.51 and we also saw a gain of a cent against the Euro to 1.16. Also UK interest rate futures (confusingly called short sterling and my old stomping ground) were sold off in heavy selling and fell by 0.04. I know that sounds a small change but in these markets that is significant. I was also reminded of an option call spread which had been sold in large size earlier this week.

What did that make you think Shaun?

Suspicions then arose that the interview with Mervyn King would be bullish for the UK economy (leading to weaker interest-rate futures) and also for the exchange rate of the pound.There was already food for thought here and just to give you an idea of the scepticism in some quarters that such a statement would be made a former Monetary Policy Committee member Andrew Sentance promised to eat his hat if it was. I hope it is tasty!

If we look back we can see why this might be considered a significant change. After all it was only in February that Mervyn King had voted for an extra £25 billion of Quantitative Easing in the UK economy on the grounds that its prospects were weak. Also back last November he told us that the rally in the pound that had taken place was “unwelcome” which in the esoteric and arcane language of central bankers is virtually an invitation to sell!

So as you can see from his past statements a bullish pro-sterling interview would be a surprise to say the least.

What did Mervyn King actually say?

The tone and theme is set here.

Recovery is in sight

Also when probed on the exchange rate of the pound he said this.

We are moving to a properly valued exchange rate, I think we are there

Which was then reinforced by an unequivocal statement.

We are certainly not looking to push sterling down

Unfortunately we were the misled which is a common feature of interviews with Mervyn King and those less polite than me might call the next bit an outright lie.

The ability of the UK to rebalance its economy by exporting is going well

You do not have to take my word for this let me quote from a speech by one of Mervyn King’s colleagues at the Monetary Policy Committee Martin Weale.

the balance of trade measured in current prices is now not much better than it was in 2008……the growth in net exports following from the depreciation has been weaker than I would have expected

But at the same time, the impact (of the 2007/08 fall in the pound of circa 25%) on export volumes has been disappointing. The gain compared with 2008Q1 is small

So is “small” the new “going well”? As the speech was less than a month ago then perhaps Mervyn is getting a little forgetful at his age or he deliberately forgot it.

If we move on Mervyn King then adopts a very familiar policy which is to say the news is good if we ignore all the bad bits. Even the famously occasionally and temporarily blind Arsene Wenger would struggle with that one! If we ignore the bits which are shrinking and only count the good bits.

We are growing at 1.5% per year

On that basis AVB could declare that Spurs won one-nil last night at the San Siro!

In the transcript published Mervyn King did something familiar which is to completely contradict himself.

We need a big shift of resources towards exports, towards manufacturing and business investment

But Mervyn exports are “going well” aren’t they? Those who follow the use of the phrase “on track” and have pointed out the lack of its use in the UK I am sorry to tell you that this is no longer true and the emphasis is mine.

That balance has to be changed. Policies are in place to achieve it. We are on track to achieve it

For newer readers who have no followed the dreadful track record of this phrase its use in the Euro area has become associated with economic collapse and soup kitchens and usually quite quickly too.

Does Mervyn King have a good record in predicting things?

No, in fact it is dreadful! He has been part of a Bank of England operation which has developed a shocking forecasting record such that you look at it now only to know what will not happen. Indeed if we look at past interviews with ITV News we can go back to the 6th of October 2011 for some insight on this.

We’re past the worst

essentially from our point of view low inflation

Since then the economy has not grown and may in fact have shrunk but inflation has. Indeed the official inflation measure called CPI has been over target for every month since and if anything is accelerating right now. This does matter because nearly a year and a half later we are now in the period where Bank of England promises should come true for an interview given in October 2011.

Also there was an even more significant error tucked away in that interview.

Slow but steady increases in real take-home pay will start to come through

Instead it has continued to fall and the latest estimate is that over the credit crunch period it has totalled some 7%. This has been a strong contractionary influence on the UK economy and a reason why Mervyn King’s policies have failed.

Comment

If anybody from the Financial Services Authority is reading this and after all there are several thousand of them and the daily “Hear no evil,speak no evil,see no evil” meeting might be over they should take a close look at what happened yesterday. Whilst events happening at one time may not be related to others this is potentially so serious and indeed transparent that I would be all over it like a rash if I was in charge of the FSA.

To the layperson this may not seem that significant but the nature of the change and the involvement albeit unwittingly of the Governor of the Bank of England means that you cannot have suspicions of some having the “early wire”. As Pink put it.

Who knew?

If we return to the UK economy we see that whatever Mervyn King said is likely to be wrong. As I have demonstrated today he has been forecasting low inflation and a recovery for some years now which kind of extends the Arsene Wenger analogy does it not? However some good has come out of it for now as the rally in the pound is welcome and as I type this we are at US $1.513 and Euro 1.161.

The Bank of England elsewhere

The Bank of England has reviewed itself on the subject of inflation forecasting where its record as discussed earlier has been appalling. But in true Quango fashion it has in essence apparently missed this and the most common phrase from the report is below.

No change to current practice is planned

I wonder how much the Stockton review cost to reach this conclusion?

Private equity

Here is an area where I would like to agree one hundred percent with the Bank of England as tucked away in its Quarterly Bulletin is this.

In the mid-2000s, there was a dramatic increase in the value of private equity sponsored buyouts of UK companies. Aided by loose credit conditions, the leverage on these buyouts, in particular on large deals, was high.

In my view this is yet another shark in the water and I would be interested in readers thoughts as to the implications and what we can do. Otherwise we are in danger of yet another “surprise”.

This entry was posted in GDP, General Economics, Growth, Inflation, Quantitative Easing and Extraordinary Monetary Measures, Stagflation, UK Inflation Prospects and Issues and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Justathought

    Hi Shaun,

    Interesting blog indeed… “Shark” should be in plural. Isn’t Georges Soros just offered himself “Heinz”? We still have many champion global players in UK… Five years observation for patient predators is probably more than enough for abundant and successful kills especially when loaded with infinite “out of thin air” ammunitions and regardless of the collateral damages implied (Humans costs, but of course societies are notorious to sacrifice their own population always been and always will be… nothing new under the sun…oh dear is my psychopath tendency surfacing again…?)

  • Drf

    “In the mid-2000s, there was a dramatic increase in the
    value of private equity sponsored buyouts of UK companies. Aided by
    loose credit conditions, the leverage on these buyouts, in particular on
    large deals, was high.

    In my view this is yet another shark in the water and I
    would be interested in readers thoughts as to the implications and what
    we can do. ”

    Hi Shaun,

    I agree entirely that this is yet another shark in the water which is going to act like a further whiplash in the UK economy. Even parliament has discussed Private Equity so called many years ago and concluded that it is the modern form of Asset Stripping, and these discussions are recorded in Hansard.

    What Private Equity did as you mention was that when credit finance was easy they preyed on essentially healthy companies raising huge amounts of credit finance to take over a controlling interest in a company. They then proceeded to strip assets from their prey, and loaded their prey with excessive leverage to enable the Private Equity proponents to extract large sums of money. These Asset Strippers claimed to have high-level management skills which was almost always completely untrue and they were mostly not formally qualified at secondary degree level or above in Management nor experienced at higher levels, but just amateur bunglers rather like most BTL proponents. It was quite amazing in reality that they were granted the lines of credit which they obtained.

    As a result there are now many companies, previously prey of one or the other of these Asset Strippers, who are left in a very highly-geared situation, from which in the present Depression they will not be able to recover or escape (rather like the present government). Many of them may eventually become officially insolvent and be wound up. There is little that can now be done about this, and certainly the government will not be in a position to use yet more borrowed or printed money, at the expense of the taxpayer, to bail them out. So eventually many of these victims may fail and many more jobs will be lost.

    The problem was really that Private Equity initially was not recognized by most observers to be in fact the Asset Stripping function revived which it was. It should have been recognized earlier but those few who did understand the dangers and and warned against them were not paid any credence. The government at the time and the FSA should have acted then to curtail it, but it is now too late. The damage has been done.

  • Pavlaki

    I really believe that the policy of forcing down the Pound and letting inflation run riot has been a disaster. The powers that be believe that because it worked after black Wednesday it will automatically work again (despite very different world conditions) and it hasn’t. Their real stupidity is not realising that if a 25% fall hasn’t worked then it is unlikely that more of the same will is needed. Everyone I talk to is in ‘lockdown mode’ because of the erosion of their spending power due to inflation and fear about future inflation expectations. Low Sterling has has a huge effect on pushing up prices of imported goods and energy and I doubt we will see them drop again if the exchange rate should improve. We need domestic consumption to drive GDP during the Euro zone recession and the current B of E policies are guaranteed to have the opposite effect.

  • ernie

    Shaun – is this strange speech something to do with political pressure behind the scenes regarding the rate of inflation? Otherwise I can’t quite see why he suddenly changed tack. Perhaps they began to worry they were losing control of the “managed decline” and the import cost (notably of energy) was starting to spook them? They might have begun to fear that they would be forced to raise interest rates in the near future and wanted to try and avoid that (since they hold that high house prices are sacrosanct and must be maintained at all costs).
    Or am I just being cynical?

  • JW

    Hi Drf
    As someone who once ran a modest private equity fund for energy start-up companies , I must ask you to differentiate between ‘private equity’. You are describing the later stage funds who often are involved with the activities you describe ( but not always). There are various funds who are involved with start-ups, early stage, etc who provide a life-blood to smaller companies, and not all of them expect/demand ambitious returns.

  • JW

    Nah Ernie, he’s just got a relative who’s placed a bet ( sorry took out an option) and wants a quick buck.

  • Alex

    I notice on my real world economic indicator Ebay things are trading down by around 15% from what they were over last year, and things don’t sell too well neither. Less desirable yachts are basically being given away for a few hundred quid.
    I have hopes that its the come down from the Christmas period, January, Feb and March, but it may be the summer does little to lift it if consumers continue in their lock down mode.

    Still I heard on the news the government workers are to be offered a 1% pay rise. A bit like the staving man who has a dog. To make soup, he cuts off the dogs tail to make soup, and the dog being given some soup to share, licks the mans hand in appreciation.

  • Anonymous

    Shaun,

    Funding for private equity buyouts I seem to remember was for 7-8 years so bullet payments needed in 2014/15 as little repayment of principle in most of theses deals?

  • forbin

    talking about inflation I saw this article

    http://www.nbcnews.com/business/economywatch/consumer-prices-soar-inflation-check-1C8886085

    “Consumer prices soar, but inflation is in check”

    I’m waiting for Merve the Swerve to use this !!

    Forbin

  • forbin

    hello shaun

    as far as private equity goes and that tactic – they’re not the only ones

    hasn’t Kraft done that with Cadburys?

    buying a company with assets cheap and front loading it then with debt whilst the parent company walks of with massive profits should be outlawed – how I don’t know but I do smell a rat with these type of deals

    Then again look at the football clubs – aren’t they massivley leveraged – nice description – leverage, common people dont understand it , it means debt !

    If you asked then if they supported this type of operation /takeover knowing its debt and the holding company is walking off with the profits they’ll say it was a swindle!!

    Forbin

    sex pistols – great rock ‘n’ roll swindle :-)

  • Anonymous

    Hi Drf,

    I’d suggest that they start by making buyout debt interest tax nondeductable. Make finance to buy productivity improving tech tax deductable.

    Also we should let bad banks go bust – there is no better incentive for bankers to diligently screen loans.

    how would you suggest regulation changes to make asset stripping less desirable, especially without Sarbanes-Oxley regulatory overkill ?

  • Anonymous

    “Does Mervyn King have a good record in predicting things?
    No, in fact it is dreadful!”

    Why oh why do we have to persist with the absurd dance? The other explanation to King being a “dreadful” forecaster is that he is a liar. If one instead looks at what he is doing as backsliding under pressure of the collapse of the UK economy due to mistakes he made in years gone by then we have a pattern of behaviour that is readily explainable.

    There is clearly a lot of panicking behind the scenes. Lots of ground moving under the feet. Merv about to go and wants to leave on a high. Osborne under pressure. Cameron under big pressure. Let’s see what the budget holds in 5 days. My guess is more fauxsterity, absurd guestimates and a dash of obfuscation. Will the markets buy it for much longer? The clock is most certainly ticking…

  • Noo 2 Economics

    Hi Forbin,

    Another thing about that article is that US gasoline inventories are at record highs compared to the 5 year average!

  • Noo 2 Economics

    Hi Shaun,

    “those less polite than me might call the next bit an outright lie” that would be me then. However, I agree with Merv that the pound is about right against the dollar (maybe should be a bit lower – circa $1.40 – $1.45).

    Of course by “Slow but steady increases in real take-home pay will start to come through” he may mean exactly what he says, so maybe wait and see should be the best course of action here, although I’m not holding my breath.

    Someone else said on here that the establishment may be beginning to panic at the rising cost of oil as an expression of the deteriorating exchange rate. I am most persuaded by that argument as to the motivations behind the speech. I think we can all see that recovery is not upon us (although I expect small growth in this first quarter but then nothing for the following quarters – maybe Merv has seen the early numbers for 1st quarter?) and the only thing manufacturing and exports are on track for is shrinkage during the full course of 2013, the Depression continues.

    I should describe Swervin Mervyn’s speech as a desperate last ditch attempt to kid everyone that we are alright to try to bump the pound and get rising energy costs/inflation under control – pathetic.

  • Noo 2 Economics

    Actually, that comment: ” The ability of the UK to rebalance its economy by exporting is going well” – he’s very careful isn’t he? The “ability” – not that it’s actually happening.

    How do you prove or disprove that a country’s export “ability” is improving or worsening? I mean “ability” is pretty intangible isn’t it?

    Give Merv his due he’s a wordsmith.

    My song nomination for today is Talking Heads “Psycho Killer” – “Your talking a lot but you’re not really saying anything”

  • JW

    Hi Forbin

    The 0.1% increase in food prices in my personal experience is a complete invention. I saw price increases of over 10% in a week in February in fruits and vegetables in Florida. The extent of ‘seasonal adjustments’ in US economic indicators now makes it almost impossible to see the actual underlying trends. The Case-Shiller home price index is just about the only one that uses actual numbers, and as Mr Shiller is often quoted as saying recently, he sees no signs of confidence returning to the market despite the spin of the MSM.

  • Pavlaki

    Not the topic I know but have just read that Spain’s retail sales are down 9% year on year and have declined for 31 months in a row!

  • Drf

    Hi JW,

    I would suggest that you are confusing Venture Capital Funds with Private Equity? It seems to me that what you were involved in was a form of Venture Capital Fund rather than a Private Equity activity. This is typical of the problem which occurs with many of these buzzword terms, in that people use them to mean slightly different things and confusion then results. If you were funding start-up companies then I would suggest that was a function as a form of Venture Capital Fund, not Private Equity at all.

  • Drf

    Hi Expatin,

    I would suggest that the issue goes even further than discussed. I also believe that all highly leveraged acquisitions are bad for the economy in reality, because they result a too high a gearing in any enterprise thus acquired and they discourage organic growth. I would thus suggest that regulation is necessary to prevent all significantly leveraged purchases of enterprises. In other words unless equity capital can be raised there should be no ability to make predatory or hostile take-overs of other enterprises. But that would only stop such abuses in the future; it could do nothing to salvage the damage already done.

  • Anonymous

    Hi Expat

    This is the direction I was heading in too,and it would be tempting to extend into the buy to let arena as well…

  • Anonymous

    Hi Ernie

    Actually Mervyn King has confirmed my analysis that it is as if there are two of them as last night he was quoted as again saying the UK needed more Quantitative Easing. Presumably not because the “Recovery is in sight”

    Also on JWs point below perhaps someone is long option gamma and wants to make a profit both ways… Or Mervyn is a fan of the nursery rhyme The Grand Old Duke Of York.

  • Anonymous

    Hi Guys

    No doubt Paul Krugman will be along to say that this does not matter.

    “The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.7 percent in February on a seasonally adjusted basis, the U.S.Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.”

    Because you see

    “The gasoline index rose 9.1 percent in February to account for almost three-fourths of the seasonally adjusted all items increase.”

    And as we all know gasoline is unimportant and I-Pads are vital…

  • Anonymous

    Hi Chris

    Yes one of the problems cited has been the roll-up of interest in some of these deals. Some of this was evident when the Glaziers took over Manchester United but they have been lucky in that the football boom has continued and that Fergie has delivered success, many others have lacked this luck.

    As for the numbers here are the estimates from the Bank of England

    “As it currently stands,£32 billion of LBO debt is expected to mature in the period 2014–15, with a further £41 billion in the period 2016–18.”

  • Anonymous

    Hi progrock

    Put like that next weeks Budget is in fact an irrelevance put on for the media. All they can do is fiddle at the edges as the main events are already beyond their control.

  • Anonymous

    Nice Talking Heads reference.

    David Byrne also once observed that he felt that you should keep your money in your shoe. Advice which depositors in Cyprus may well wish they had heeded after last night.

  • Anonymous

    Hi Pavlaki

    Even worse have you seen what the Euro area has done to depositors in Cyprus? This one will run and run probably literally!

  • JW

    Hi Drf
    Its you that is confused I’m afraid, pretty sure I know what I ran, the men in white coats haven’t visited (yet!).

  • Pavlaki

    I have indeed and I have to say I am shocked. If I still had deposits in Greece I would move them right now as I see the Cyprus situation as a foretaste of what could happen in Greece (and Portugal and Spain?). I am staggered that they will stoop so low as to raid the accounts holding (in many cases) peoples life savings. Is there no end to what they will do to keep the ‘Euro dream’ going? It is only a currency and whilst I appreciate all the issues and cost of disintegration there comes a point at which people are going to say -’Is it worth it?’ We might just have reached that point in Greece as the recent drop in support for the Euro is bound have just got worse as a result of what has happened. I will try to get some feedback from family and contacts there.

  • Justathought

    Lillikas also said he was in talks with economists about creating a plan for Cyprus to leave the euro and return to the Cypriot pound….

    http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite2_1_16/03/2013_488205

  • Pavlaki

    El Pais now saying drop in retail sales 10.2%. original figure of 9% from Spain’s office for Nat Statistics. Quite a difference!

  • Anonymous

    I’m sceptical of excessive regulation – we have laws against fraud & theft. Problems include
    1 ) lack of action from the FSA – nobody in jail for Northern Rock , RBS or the Halifax/BOS scam sold to Lloyds
    2 ) rewards for failure

    I’d also note that the EU laws on state aid & cross border transfers are being violated with impunity.

    What is the point of more laws when we cannot enforce the existing rules ?

  • Anonymous

    The Cypriot savers might feel like some of AC/DC “Dirty deeds done dirt cheap”

  • Drf

    Hi JW,

    I did not suggest you were confused, although I now suspect by your rather acerbic response that you probably were. What I suggested was that there was a confusion of usage in buzzword terms, as often occurs and this leads to problems in general communication.

  • JW

    Hi Drf
    If you think that was acerbic……!
    VC is a subset of PE. If our fund was dealing with ‘tech’ or bio-tech’ etc or even ‘green energy/renewables’ it would have been in the VC niche. However it was dealing with companies with long time horizons in a very capital intensive industry. The investor required returns were similarly ‘long-term’ and modest compared to typical VC. So whilst some of the skill-set was more akin to VCs the fund’s financial structure was PE.

    The defining difference between VC and the rest of the PE asset class is the returns expected by investors because of the risks involved. Recently there has been an increasing blurring of any ‘boundaries’ as too much money chases too few quality investment opportunities, so you get what was once funds majoring in debt/mezzanine financing of LBOs etc investing in start-ups. Pure VCs in the old sense are a dying breed as everyone reduces their target returns.