On every measure the Bank of England not only has failed but is failing

This week is a crucial one for the UK economy as the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meets on Wednesday before announcing the results of its deliberations on Thursday. If we add some recent poor economic data to an MPC of which 3 members out of 9 voted for an extra £25 billion of Quantitative Easing (QE) last time around then we have to start to wonder if the 3 will grow to the necessary 5 to enact such a policy. Added to the mix was the data yesterday about the Bank of England’s prized Funding for Lending Scheme which is turned out has provided some £14 billion of cheap funding  to our banks so that they can lend some £2.4 billion less. Yes less is the new more!

Rewards for failure in banking continue

This was announced by the Bank of England yesterday.

Spencer Dale, Executive Director, Monetary Analysis and Statistics, and Chief Economist at the Bank of England, has been reappointed for a further three-year term as a member of the Monetary Policy Committee with effect from 1 June 2013

Let me give you two good reasons why this should not have happened.

1. He has been Chief Economist when the Bank of England’s forecasting of the economy has been dire. Frankly their forecasts have told us what is not going to happen!

2. He gave a speech telling us his priority was “Inflation,Inflation,Inflation” in September 2010. However on his watch some 54 out of 60 official inflation readings have been over the 2% target including the last 41. Since the speech? All of them!

So another banker rewarded for failure. Indeed handsomely rewarded at £187,800 plus pension.

Talking of failures: Funding for Lending Scheme

This is the flagship scheme that the Bank of England has for the UK economy and its spinning of its success has been that of a Whirling Dervish. The actual documentation on its website was always cautious as you can see below.

The FLS aims to encourage more lending to the UK economy than would have been the case in the absence of the scheme.

After the debacle of the promises over QE I guess someone learnt something but this was not repeated everywhere. From the MPC Minutes over the past few months.

But there had been encouraging signs concerning the effects of the Scheme, which so far appeared to be operating largely as the Committee had anticipated.

a further easing in credit conditions supported by its programme of asset purchases and by the FLS

early positive indications

On the household side, that response had been positive

the improvement was particularly pronounced

encouraging signs concerning the impact of the Scheme had continued to emerge.

Let us examine the “encouraging signs”. Bank lending fell by £2.4 billion in the last quarter of 2012 compared to the third.  In addition the two taxpayer supported banks (RBS and Lloyds) have cut lending by nearly £8 billion over the period of the scheme.

Perhaps by encouraging signs they actually meant this.

The FLS incentivises banks to boost their lending by reducing bank funding costs

So we have cut banks funding costs by providing £14 billion cheaply as they have cut lending! As I pointed out on the 18th of February this looks ever more like a (poorly) disguised attempt to subsidise the banks one more time.

Meanwhile savings rates have fallen in response to the FLS. The Bank of England measures the interest rate for new savings (Time Deposits) business and it has fallen from 3.11% in July 2012 to 2.14% in January. So we see that the scheme has to provide a boost to lending just to offset the impact of falling interest rates on savers.

As lending has fallen and savers are poorer the economy may actually end up being worse off! Well apart from the banks of course. It is always them isn’t it?

Inflation is (almost) everywhere

The problem for the Bank of England is that expectations of inflation are as important as its current level and its continual failure has meant that its credibility has collapsed amongst the general public. Indeed some members of the MPC seem set on making this bad situation even worse. Take this from David Miles in a speech last month

The remit allows inflation to deviate from target if this avoids excessive fluctuations in output. There are no explicit guidelines for the period when inflation needs to return to target.

Seeing as he was appointed to the MPC David Miles has seen inflation quickly rise above target and the remain above it. However his utter failure in this regard seems to bother him not one whit as in spite of it being above target and rising he feels this.

a good case can be made for more expansion

The expansion his policies have given us has been in inflation as over his time period there has been very little growth. We have had approximately 3% of growth whilst inflation has managed that each year on his watch as we see in which measure his policies have given us “expansion”.

Whilst they may have been able to fool some people it looks as though fewer and fewer are being fooled. From Decembers Inflation Expectations Survey.

Asked to give the current rate of inflation, respondents gave a median answer of 4.4%, compared with 4.1% in August.

In Bank of England speak such rises are described as “well-anchored”.

As ever energy prices are an issue

From the Financial Times

UK natural gas prices soared on Monday to their highest in seven years, as problems at a gas processing plant in Norway squeezed supplies and raised fears of higher household energy bills.

Actually that is a little behind the times as my provider First Utility wrote to me last week to say that my energy bills would rise by 9%. This reminds me of the issue of institutional inflation in the UK where virtual monopolies seem to manipulate the market. After all the price of Brent Crude Oil has been falling recently and aren’t gas prices in the United States much lower? How about shipping some over here?

Instead we in the UK have had this according to the FT.

The average dual-fuel bill has more than doubled over the past nine years, from £522 in 2004 to £1,352 this year, according to uSwitch.com, with the UK’s “Big Six” energy suppliers blaming the increase on the rising price of wholesale gas.

Seems like a rigged game to me.

As today is warmer there should (hopefully) be a release in the short-term and spring is on its way. But by next year climate change rules mean we will have scrapped some coal fired power stations as for example Didcot A closes this month. What happens then,particularly if the wind does not blow? No doubt “it could not possibly have been expected”.

Business Surveys

After poor readings from our construction and manufacturing business surveys today’s services reading was a considerable relief. At 51.8 the largest part of our economy is edging forwards and means that we have economic growth if only just.

Also retail sales were solid. From the British Retail Consortium.

UK retail sales values were up 2.7% on a like-for-like basis from February 2012, when they were down 0.3% on the preceding year……Excluding distortions caused by the timing of Easter in previous years, total sales grew at the fastest rate since February 2010 (4.5%). Like-for-like sales growth was the fastest since December 2009.

Comment

If we consider what the MPC will do on Thursday I think that the vote may well tighten but will most likely end up with unchanged winning. This is partly for technical reasons as there will be some £6.6 billion of QE as a maturing UK Gilt is reinvested which will give an excuse for those looking to exercise what Sir Humphrey Appleby called “masterly inaction”. But as we edge forwards we face the prospect that every initiative and option that they have tried has failed. Or rather failed if you think that raising economic growth rather than giving hidden bank subsidies was the objective.

Whilst the Bank of England virtually always discusses easing let me end today by putting a fly in their ointment. There is a Shadow MPC which has already met for March and they concluded this.

the Shadow Monetary Policy Committee (SMPC) decided by five votes to four that Bank Rate should be raised on Thursday 7th March. Three SMPC members wanted an immediate increase of 1⁄2%, while two advocated a rise of 1⁄4%, implying a rise of 1⁄4% on normal Bank of England voting procedures.

I will return to this subject but will leave you with this thought, such a policy is rejected by those who have failed and are failing and sadly look likely to fail.

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Banking Reform, General Economics, Inflation, Interest rates, Quantitative Easing and Extraordinary Monetary Measures, Stagflation, UK Inflation Prospects and Issues and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Justathought

    Hi Shaun,

    I wonder what our failing banking central elites will say when the pound crisis will hit… (It seems we might heading for one and sooner that one can expect, or maybe that what they are after…)

  • Anonymous

    Does the man on the street really have inflation expectations? People I know look back at price rises and extrapolate from there, at best. At worst they just notice they have less money as things get more expensive and are forced to cut back.

    Your blog contrasts with FTAV today Shaun. There we are told the UK is back in the race: http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/03/05/1410062/a-triple-dip-avoided/

    Can’t say I’m convinced. I bet they do more QE this week also…

  • Patrick

    Who is/are the Shadow MPC? They’re different from the League of Shadows… right?

  • Anonymous

    It seems to me that when the UK was a ‘global power’, there were always men in sheds inventing all sorts of interesting things, matched at the large end by engineering innovators running ground breaking projects. These ideas and expertise were exported all over the world, creating wealth for the nation.

    We now have a situation where men in Ivory Sponges (definition – Ivory Towers that soak up huge amounts of money and ideas) are spending time figuring out how to bolster the Tower against reality, to enable it to suck in more resource. Exportable ideas yes as there are a number of Ivory Towers around the world, but non productive. On a smaller scale people are beavering away figuring out new financial innovations to protect against the Towers predatory actions. Again, non productive. So now we have systemic wealth destruction?

    Worrying as you cant beat the Tower, even though the Tower cant do without you……

  • Drf

    Yea Patrick, I think you are right with your prediction concerning QE. After all you just have to remember the real reason for QE, rather than paying any attention at all to the fatuous and erroneous “to stimulate the economy” one!

  • Patrick

    Have a read of this article for examples of how they’re looking to bolster their tower’s defences…

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/04/education-capitalist-command-economy

  • Anonymous

    Shaun,
    £ devalues and allows customer gouging by all utilities as no competition and they can blame higher import prices. Knock on effect for all energy users and therefore prices including exports need to increase. Any “benefits” of devaluation immediately lost.

    Coupled with negative growth in wages I am surprised things are not worse – still the banks are still taking the largesse ( for your lexicon).

  • MickC

    The moment interest rates rise many people now, barely surviving, will quite simply cease the struggle.
    The housing market, such as it is, will collapse-followed quickly thereafter by the economy.
    The reduction in interest rates has never been passed onto borrowers-but, by God, the rise will be.
    Naturally, once many borrowers just give up, the banks (already actually insolvent) will become technically and legally insolvent. The state will not be able to bail them out (and never should have in my view) and after that-well, thats anybodys guess.
    Incidentally, Osborne seems to think its a good idea to defend “Banker’s Bonuses”-it isn’t. It’s about as sensible as backing the Trade Unions was for some of the Labour party in the Winter of Discontent-and an excellent way to make the EU more relevant than the UK government.
    What planet is this shambles of a government from? Answers on a postcard….

  • Rods

    Hi Shaun,

    Most of the energy companies have invested heavily in their own gas supply fields. When you look at their accounts they like to quote things like they only make 92p per customer per week etc, etc. But that is for the retail part, when you look at the price they sell the gas to their retail division, the then the supply part profits are eye watering, because of course they value it a spot market prices.

    Unfortunately the US doesn’t currently have the facilities to produce LPG for exporting, which is a major reason the gas price is so low in the US. Apparently facilities are being built.

    Where other European countries have extensive storage facilities so they can purchase their winter gas at summer prices and store it, we have very limited storage capacity. Some European countries also have long term supply contracts and get their gas at better prices than the spot market.

    Once the coal fired power stations have closed, the UK’s spare generating capacity will drop from 14% to less than 5% and it doesn’t matter how many more useless bird slaughtering windmills they blight the landscape with, because of course they need base load backup for when there is no wind or the wrong sort of wind where it is too strong! An Australian study has shown that as you add more windmills, so grid stability gets worse and the more base load power stations you have inefficiently idling which produces more CO2 than the windmills save! Grid instability is why the Germans are now rushing the construction of 12 coal fired power stations to replace their nuclear ones. Ironically, coal fired power stations emit much more nuclear particles from coal into the environment than nuclear power stations would ever be allowed too. You really could make it up when it comes to so many things done for eco/green reasons and their unintended consequences!

    From what I can see like our water market, the electricity and gas markets are also rigged in the incumbents favour. Another Government regulation failure.

    I agree the BOE is failure, but I think the same also very much applies to the Treasury and the Chancellor. No effort has been made to rebalance the economy by cutting the public sector followed by tax cuts. I was looking at the UK’s velocity of money at the weekend which has been on a downward trajectory since John Major turned on the public spending tap ad raised taxes before the 1997 election. In the last 12 months is has picked up very slightly, but to me this shows how moribund our economy has become since 1995 and is likely to stay with the chancellor’s BOE’s and Treasury’s current policies with no real spending and tax cuts and supply side reforms making no progress apart from being talked about!

  • Anonymous

    Shaun, from your many writings in the last couple of years, it’s pretty clear that the BoE is not entirely what it seems. Directed by the government to ensure inflation rises, while repeating ad nauseam that its focus is on keeping it very low, it stumbles from one complex pretence to another. In the end the people involved simply lose all credibility, and have to move on. Don’t you Mervyn. There is a maxim in politics which goes like this: If someone in power denies something consistently while all the evidence is to the contrary, and especially if that something is rather undesirable on the whole but favours the policies of the government, then it almost certainly is happening. Sir Humphrey knew a thing or two. I know this was happening during and probably before the time of Pepys and every generation has to figure it out for themselves. We give our politicians and officials too much benefit of the doubt. But this generation is finally learning… they are not working on our behalf.

  • Anonymous

    Hi Shaun,

    Is the question about accountability at the BoE & accountability for the rate setting committee ?

    G Brown announced that he was making the rate setting committee independent. This political move reduces accountability to voters and allows the chancellor to avoid responsibility for rate setting. In hindsight it looks like we’d be better having the chancellor responsible, at least we get a vote on renewing the chancellor’s position once every 5 years.

  • JW

    Hi Rods
    Agree with your comments on the energy sector. As I have previously posted its still ( not quite) too late to reverse some of the idiotic, half-baked lunacy that has passed as UK Energy Policy and Planning over the last 20 years or more.

    Coal plant should be reprieved, ignore EU directives. Quick build of gas storage to smooth seasonal costs. These two ‘initiatives’ would help to at least stabilise prices and supply. End the folly of ‘wind’ and ‘solar’ , the only renewables that make sense in the UK are old hydro and local ‘heat and power’ from incinerators. Fracking needs to be accelerated and nuclear needs state support ( its the only way it can work).

    Energy, especially electricity is the life-force of a modern state, its far too important to leave in the hands of idiotic, self-centered politicians.

  • forbin

    seems I was late to post – well you guys have covered most of what I’d said .

    so its not just a financial crisis ahead – which would be bad enough – we have the “Energy Gap” as well.

    well just wait until the lights start going out !

    I think then the Green vote will vanish then – not that I’m unsympathetic with their view but they are not worldly wise .

    Add the fact our politico’s are utterly hopeless in understanding this issue or are too busy waiting for the “other side ” to fail ??

    oh well , get some candles as well as pop corn in!

    Forbin

  • forbin

    for you stated reasons there will not be any interest rate rise soon.

    We are run by the banks for the banks

    as for limiting bonuses – hah! I’ll be the next pope if it ever gets anywhere done!! ( loop holes are expected ! )

    Forbin

  • forbin

    “it wasn;t me” by shaggy

    Forbin

  • forbin

    and here is the latest Financial Football results

    banks 2

    people 0

    from talking heads – once in a life time

    “same as it ever was ,same as it ever was”

    Forbin

  • DaveS

    Exactly – thats why the tie themselves up in knots in their daft doublespeak speeches.

    Except I don’t think anybody will have to “move on”. Mervyn is retiring as planned. I think the BoE is doing exactly what the powers that be want – whether that be the government, the markets, the banks or the wealthy,

    Its not representing the interests of British citizens but then its not an elected body so it doesn’t give a damn about the citizens.

  • DaveS

    Engineers/scientists create wealth – economists destroy it.

  • Anonymous

    Maybe the UK ought to inject some market reality into electricity purchase. With intelligent meters, should be possible to let consumers buy direct from generating companies. (either by a spot market or a preagreed price) Greenies can order wind power – either they buy batteries to store wind energy or watch the lights go out. Likewise let those who want solar power pay for it without public subsidy.

    This would also allow supporters of nuclear power to sign up long term contracts – if enough people signed up, then the utility has commercial grounds to build new power plants. Market forces can bring some surprisingly efficient results.

  • Anonymous

    Hi progrock and welcome to my part of the blogosphere.
    Thanks for the FT link although they are really only giving us today’s (better) data. As for the MPC you could easily be correct as I expect that vote will be tight and it will only take 2 to switch. However I feel that they might wait before pressing the button. So it is only timing as I have been expecting more QE eventually. But I know from trading experience that the saying the best laid plans of mice and men can be apt and I might be being too clever by half…

  • Anonymous

    Hi Patrick
    They are organised if that is the right word by the Institute of Economic Affairs. As far as I know they have no such affiliations and nor are they linked to the Shadows who popped up in Banylon 5.

  • Anonymous

    Hi MickC

    Before all this began there was talk that any interest rate rise of any significance would cause a catastrophe. Then they meant from 5% to 6%.
    Now we get the argument that say from 0.5% to 1.5% would be. What next we cant raise from -2% to -1%? We are in danger of getting ourselves trapped I think and we need like someone in a maze to start to find our way out.

  • Anonymous

    Hi ExpatInBG
    I entirely agree and think the same. To put it another way the independence lasted maybe ten years if I am being generous (The 2002/03 switch to CPI from RPI for example)., so capture didnt take that long did it?
    I got busy with the RPI campaign and other matters but its time to brush off my campaign for elections to the MPC again I think. Direct accountatbility is a route out of the current mess where it is an expensive but useless Quango.

  • Noo 2 Economics

    Hi Shaun , You have clearly misunderstood Spencer Dale’s intention in stating his priority was “inflation, inflation inflation” – think about it in light of the evidence.

    I understand the “Good case for expansion” of which David Miles speaks – to inflate the Government/banks debt away of course.

    Of course you can always read their statements in the opposite way to the meaning most people interpret from their statements. This is because they are being careful to ensure that ambiguity so they can never be successfully accused of being “wrong” and we know what they really mean, but, to paraphrase Abraham Lincoln, as long as they can fool most of the people most of the time every ones happy!

  • http://twitter.com/ukgoldbug Gold Bug

    The Bank of England has not failed. If you believe the PR nonsense about what it’s job is then yes it has but if you realise that it’s actual job is to maintain the money go round between government and banks through a combination of low interest rates and money printing. That also keeps the public debt burden down whilst destroying people’s savings. In short it manages the destruction of the currency to keep the elite’s money machine going. By that measure it’s success has been enormous.