Wonga used non-existent law firms to chase customer debts – 45,000 customers to get £2.6m redress between them

25th June 2014


Wonga has agreed to pay compensation of over £2.6m to around 45,000 customers for unfair and misleading debt collection practices in which it used non-existent law firms to chase payment.

In an investigation begun by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and taken forward by the Financial Conduct Authority, Wonga was found to have sent letters to customers in arrears from non-existent law firms, threatening legal action. In some instances, Wonga also added charges to customers’ accounts to cover the administration fees associated with sending the letters.

The failings, which took place between October 2008 and November 2010, saw Wonga, and other companies within its group, use unfair debt collection practices which put customers under great pressure to make loan repayments that many could not afford.

During this time, Wonga sent communications to customers in arrears under the names “Chainey, D’Amato & Shannon” and “Barker and Lowe Legal Recoveries”, leading customers to believe that their outstanding debt had been passed to a law firm, or other third party. Further legal action was threatened if the debt was not repaid.

In fact, neither Chainey D’Amato & Shannon nor Barker & Lowe existed and Wonga was using this tactic to maximise collections by piling the pressure on customers.

Wonga is the UK’s biggest payday lender and in 2012 it made nearly four million loans to over one million customers. The agreement with the FCA is as follows:

Wonga must identify and pay redress to all affected customers. While some customers will receive cash, others will likely have their outstanding balance reduced.

The FCA has appointed a skilled person to oversee the process and ensure that affected customers get what they are owed.

The process will start by mid-July with compensation likely to be paid from the end of July. It is thought that up to 45,000 customers could receive, between them, a total of over £2.6m in compensation.

The poor practice was uncovered by the former consumer credit regulator, the OFT, in 2011 in response to formal notices requiring Wonga to disclose certain information about its debt collection practices. The FCA took over the investigation on 1 April 2014 when it became responsible for consumer credit.

In April 2014, Wonga also reported to the FCA that it had discovered system errors relating to the calculation of the amount owing on customer accounts where fees, balance adjustments or the timing used to calculate interest were not consistently applied.

Customers do not need to take any action: Wonga will be contacting those that have been affected by these issues shortly.

Clive Adamson, director of supervision at the FCA, says: “Wonga’s misconduct was very serious because it had the effect of exacerbating an already difficult situation for customers in arrears. We are pleased that Wonga has been working with us to put matters right for its customers and to ensure that these historical practices are truly a thing of the past.

“The FCA expects firms to pay particular attention to fair treatment of those who have difficulty in meeting their loan repayments.”

Callous intimidation

Citizens Advice Chief Executive Gillian Guy has condemned Wonga. She said:“Fake legal letters hounding people in debt is callous intimidation.  This latest revelation of payday lending practices is further evidence how out of control the industry has become.  It is only fair the FCA makes Wonga compensate people who have been put under tremendous financial and emotional pressure because of these letters.

“Irresponsible payday lending has been a scourge on borrowers looking for a short-term loan to tide them over.  People have been coming to Citizens Advice because payday lenders are harassing them, taking more money than they owe and chasing people for debts they didn’t take out.  It is really important the FCA uses the powers it has to wipe out the horrendous practices used by many payday lenders.”

1 thought on “Wonga used non-existent law firms to chase customer debts – 45,000 customers to get £2.6m redress between them”

  1. Noo 2 Economics says:

    This is outright fraudulent practice. Why hasn’t Wonga been fined the same amount as it has to pay in compensation?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *